memoire-m2

My M2 Memoire on mapping class groups & their representations

Commit
499b2b0f13479a61016a1fffde219fbbd7bc4bf2
Parent
376591004a1cf1460f8eb547c71113c73765a23a
Author
Pablo <pablo-pie@riseup.net>
Date

Fixed a typo

Diffstats

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

Status Name Changes Insertions Deletions
Modified sections/presentation.tex 2 files changed 2 2 
diff --git a/sections/presentation.tex b/sections/presentation.tex
@@ -303,8 +303,8 @@ We would like to say \(\pi_0(\SHomeo^+(S_\ell^b, \partial S_\ell^b)) =
 \(\phi, \psi \in \SHomeo^+(S_\ell^b, \partial S_\ell^b)\) define the same class
 in \(\SMod(S_\ell^b)\) if they are isotopic, but they may not lie in same
 connected component of \(\SHomeo^+(S_\ell^b, \partial S_\ell^b)\) if they are
-not isotopic \emph{through homeomorphisms symmetric homeomorphisms}.
-Birman-Hilden \cite{birman-hilden} showed that this is never the case.
+not isotopic \emph{through symmetric homeomorphisms}. Birman-Hilden
+\cite{birman-hilden} showed that this is never the case.
 
 \begin{theorem}[Birman-Hilden]
   If \(\phi, \psi \in \SHomeo^+(S_\ell^b, \partial S_\ell^b)\) are isotopic