- Commit
- 015def272b6f3c8711a21d6ece349e88a5b976b6
- Parent
- d345d2aecb5bce9140ab0a1a36533414dcccbdb0
- Author
- Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
- Date
Edited some TODO items
Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules
Edited some TODO items
1 file changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
Status | File Name | N° Changes | Insertions | Deletions |
Modified | sections/mathieu.tex | 6 | 4 | 2 |
diff --git a/sections/mathieu.tex b/sections/mathieu.tex @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ \(\mathfrak{sl}_2(K)\). \end{example} +% TODOO: Do we need this proposition? I think this only comes up in the +% classification of simple completely reducible coherent families \begin{proposition} If \(\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{z} \oplus \mathfrak{s}_1 \oplus \cdots \oplus \mathfrak{s}_n\), where \(\mathfrak{z}\) is the center of \(\mathfrak{g}\) @@ -239,8 +241,8 @@ % comes from the relationship between highest weight modules and coherent % families -% TODOO: I think this is equivalent to M being a simple object in the -% category of coherent families. This is perhaps a more intuitive formulation +% TODO: Point out this is equivalent to M being a simple object in the +% category of coherent families \begin{definition} A coherent family \(\mathcal{M}\) is called \emph{irreducible} if \(\mathcal{M}_\lambda\) is a simple