- Commit
- 214d065f1d9e18fa2ba11f8ace90a80b4ab89c4b
- Parent
- 2b4ab7e6954447ef9ceedc4de24ffe0bfb24cfc5
- Author
- Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
- Date
Repharased a sentence
Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules
Repharased a sentence
1 file changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
Status | File Name | N° Changes | Insertions | Deletions |
Modified | sections/semisimple-algebras.tex | 4 | 2 | 2 |
diff --git a/sections/semisimple-algebras.tex b/sections/semisimple-algebras.tex @@ -9,8 +9,8 @@ was the decision to consider the eigenspace decomposition \end{equation} This was simple enough to do in the case of \(\mathfrak{sl}_2(K)\), but the -reasoning behind it, as well as the mere fact equation (\ref{sym-diag}) holds, -are harder to explain in the case of \(\mathfrak{sl}_3(K)\). The eigenspace +rational behind it and the reason why equation (\ref{sym-diag}) holds are +harder to explain in the case of \(\mathfrak{sl}_3(K)\). The eigenspace decomposition associated with an operator \(V \to V\) is a very well-known tool, and readers familiarized with basic concepts of linear algebra should be used to this type of argument. On the other hand, the eigenspace decomposition