lie-algebras-and-their-representations

Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules

Commit
5c69cc58e3d14fb3eb32ce22c6acb53297960e2f
Parent
3eebca52c020e8dae3207aef16c93b5fb74d8021
Author
Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
Date

Changed the notation for the PBW Theorem

Changed the notation to refer to the PBW theorem to make it standard-conformat

Diffstat

2 files changed, 9 insertions, 8 deletions

Status File Name N° Changes Insertions Deletions
Modified sections/introduction.tex 15 8 7
Modified sections/mathieu.tex 2 1 1
diff --git a/sections/introduction.tex b/sections/introduction.tex
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ basis \(\{X_i\}_i\) for \(\mathfrak{g}\) induces an isomorphism
 \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g}) \cong K[X_1, \ldots, X_i, \ldots]\). More generally,
 we find\dots
 
-\begin{theorem}[Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt]\index{Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem}
+\begin{theorem}[Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt]\index{PBW Theorem}
   Let \(\mathfrak{g}\) be a Lie algebra over \(K\) and \(\{X_i\}_i \subset
   \mathfrak{g}\) be an ordered basis for \(\mathfrak{g}\) -- i.e. a basis
   indexed by an ordered set. Then \(\{X_{i_1} \cdot X_{i_2} \cdots X_{i_n} : n
@@ -687,8 +687,9 @@ we find\dots
   \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})\).
 \end{theorem}
 
-The Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem is hugely important and will come up again
-and again throughout these notes. Among other things, it implies\dots
+This last result is known as \emph{the PBW Theorem}. It is hugely important and
+will come up again and again throughout these notes. Among other things, it
+implies\dots
 
 \begin{corollary}
   Let \(\mathfrak{g}\) be a Lie algebra over \(K\). Then
@@ -696,13 +697,13 @@ and again throughout these notes. Among other things, it implies\dots
   \to \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})\) is injective.
 \end{corollary}
 
-The Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem can also be used to compute a series of
+The PBW Theorem can also be used to compute a series of
 examples.
 
 \begin{example}
   Consider the Lie algebra \(\mathfrak{gl}_n(K)\) and its canonical basis
   \(\{E_{i j}\}_{i j}\). Even though \(E_{i j} E_{j k} = E_{i k}\) in the
-  associative algebra \(\operatorname{End}(K^n)\), the Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt
+  associative algebra \(\operatorname{End}(K^n)\), the PBW
   Theorem implies \(E_{i j} E_{j k} \ne E_{i k}\) in
   \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{gl}_n(K))\). In general, if \(A\) is an associative
   \(K\)-algebra then the elements in the image of the inclusion \(A \to
@@ -728,7 +729,7 @@ examples.
   is an isomorphism of algebras. Since the elements of \(\mathfrak{g}\) commute
   with the elements of \(\mathfrak{h}\) in \(\mathfrak{g} \oplus
   \mathfrak{h}\), a simple calculation shows that \(f\) is indeed a
-  homomorphism of algebras. In addition, the Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem
+  homomorphism of algebras. In addition, the PBW Theorem
   implies that \(f\) is a linear isomorphism.
 \end{example}
 
@@ -791,7 +792,7 @@ As one would expect, the same holds for complex Lie groups and algebraic groups
 too -- if we replace \(C^\infty(G)\) by \(\mathcal{O}(G)\) and \(K[G]\),
 respectively. This last proposition has profound implications. For example, it
 affords us an analytic proof of certain particular cases of the
-Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem. Most surprising of all,
+PBW Theorem. Most surprising of all,
 Proposition~\ref{thm:geometric-realization-of-uni-env} implies
 \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})\)-modules are \emph{precisely} the same as modules
 over the ring of \(G\)-invariant differential operators -- i.e.
diff --git a/sections/mathieu.tex b/sections/mathieu.tex
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ to the case it holds. This brings us to the following definition.
   computation shows \(K \langle X_1 \cdots X_n H_1 \cdots H_m : X_i \in
   \mathfrak{g}_{\alpha_i}, H_i \in \mathfrak{h}, \alpha_i \in \Delta, \alpha =
   \alpha_1 + \cdots + \alpha_n \rangle \subset
-  \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})_\alpha\). The Poincaré-Birkoff-Witt Theorem and
+  \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})_\alpha\). The PBW Theorem and
   Example~\ref{ex:reductive-alg-equivalence} thus imply that
   \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g}) = \bigoplus_{\alpha \in Q}
   \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})_\alpha\) where \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})_\alpha =