- Commit
- 83065bba11f90b21e8c1532e67229bcbd0d92f81
- Parent
- 33044eaf6d208fbe4724c9c4f646a7f9b4a2695d
- Author
- Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
- Date
Added some remarks
Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules
Added some remarks
1 file changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
Status | File Name | N° Changes | Insertions | Deletions |
Modified | sections/introduction.tex | 10 | 6 | 4 |
diff --git a/sections/introduction.tex b/sections/introduction.tex @@ -744,7 +744,8 @@ brief overview of basic concepts of the representation theory of Lie algebras. We should stress, however, that the representation theory of Lie algebras is only a small fragment of what is today known as representation theory, which is in general concerned with a diverse spectrum of algebraic and combinatorial -structures -- such as groups, quivers and associative algebras. +structures -- such as groups, quivers and associative algebras. An introductory +exploration of some of this structures can be found in \cite{etingof}. We begin by noting that any \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})\)-module \(V\) may be regarded as a \(K\)-vector space endowed with a ``linear action'' of @@ -785,9 +786,10 @@ following definition. representation of \(\mathfrak{g}\)}. \end{example} -It is usual practice to write simply \(X \cdot v\) or \(X v\) for \(\rho(X) -v\) when the map \(\rho\) is clear from the context. For instance, one might -say\dots +Hence there is a one-to-one correspondance between representations of +\(\mathfrak{g}\) and \(\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})\)-modules. It is usual +practice to write simply \(X \cdot v\) or \(X v\) for \(\rho(X) v\) when the +map \(\rho\) is clear from the context. For instance, one might say\dots \begin{example}\label{ex:sl2-polynomial-rep} The space \(K[x, y]\) is a representation of \(\mathfrak{sl}_2(K)\) with