lie-algebras-and-their-representations
Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules
- Commit
- d34e8ad65b33d0b3ecb84b6ad9bcdfef4a8db80c
- Parent
- c2a9394c0558a6f2aed221195d0cea8911fef779
- Author
- Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
- Date
Minor tweak in notation
Changed the notation for the result which establishes a correspodance between sl(n)-sequences and weights of sl(n)
Diffstat
1 file changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/sections/coherent-families.tex b/sections/coherent-families.tex
@@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ Example~\ref{ex:cartan-of-sl} and consider the linear functionals \(\epsilon_i,
\begin{proposition}
The map
\begin{align*}
- m : \mathfrak{h}^* & \to K^n \\
+ m : \mathfrak{h}^* &
+ \to \{ \mathfrak{sl}_n\textrm{\normalfont-sequences} \} \\
\lambda &
\mapsto
(
@@ -219,15 +220,14 @@ Example~\ref{ex:cartan-of-sl} and consider the linear functionals \(\epsilon_i,
\kappa(\epsilon_n, \lambda + \rho)
)
\end{align*}
- is \(W\)-equivariant bijection onto the space of all
- \(\mathfrak{sl}_n\)-sequences, where the action \(W \cong S_n\) on
- \(\mathfrak{h}^*\) is given by the dot-action and the action of \(W\) on
- \(K^n\) is given my permuting coordinates. A weight \(\lambda \in
- \mathfrak{h}^*\) satisfies the conditions of
- Lemma~\ref{thm:sl-bounded-weights} if, and only if
- the diferences between all but one consecutive coordinates of \(m(\lambda)\)
- are positive integers -- i.e. there is some unique \(i < n\) such that
- \(m(\lambda)_i - m(\lambda)_{i + 1}\) is \emph{not} a positive integer.
+ is \(W\)-equivariant bijection, where the action \(W \cong S_n\) on
+ \(\mathfrak{h}^*\) is given by the dot-action and the action of \(W\) on the
+ space of \(\mathfrak{sl}_n\)-sequences is given my permuting coordinates. A
+ weight \(\lambda \in \mathfrak{h}^*\) satisfies the conditions of
+ Lemma~\ref{thm:sl-bounded-weights} if, and only if the diferences between all
+ but one consecutive coordinates of \(m(\lambda)\) are positive integers --
+ i.e. there is some unique \(i < n\) such that \(m(\lambda)_i - m(\lambda)_{i
+ + 1}\) is \emph{not} a positive integer.
\end{proposition}
% TODO: Change the notation for 𝓟 ? The paper on affine vertex algebras calls