diff --git a/sections/representations.tex b/sections/representations.tex
@@ -2,11 +2,12 @@
Having built a solid understanding of the combinatorics of Dehn twists, we are
now ready to attack the problem of classifying the representations of
-\(\Mod(S_g)\). Indeed, in light of the Wajnryb presentation, a representation
-\(\rho : \Mod(S_g) \to \GL_n(\mathbb{C})\) is nothing other than a choice of
-\(2g + 1\) matrices \(\rho(\tau_{\alpha_1}), \ldots, \rho(\tau_{\alpha_{2g}})
-\in \GL_n(\mathbb{C})\) satisfying the relations \strong{(i)} to \strong{(v)}
-from Theorem~\ref{thm:wajnryb-presentation}.
+sufficiently small dimension of \(\Mod(S_g)\) . Indeed, in light of the Wajnryb
+presentation, a representation \(\rho : \Mod(S_g) \to \GL_n(\mathbb{C})\) is
+nothing other than a choice of \(2g + 1\) matrices \(\rho(\tau_{\alpha_1}),
+\ldots, \rho(\tau_{\alpha_{2g}}) \in \GL_n(\mathbb{C})\) satisfying the
+relations \strong{(i)} to \strong{(v)} from
+Theorem~\ref{thm:wajnryb-presentation}.
Historically, these relations have been exploited by Funar \cite{funar},
Franks-Handel \cite{franks-handel} and others to establish the triviality of