- Commit
- 12047085f6e751cae156e4fb690b3f7ebeace90c
- Parent
- 7c14f2cb28b7341de7e556e6f840eb76710196e9
- Author
- Pablo <pablo-escobar@riseup.net>
- Date
Removed duplicate words
Source code for my notes on representations of semisimple Lie algebras and Olivier Mathieu's classification of simple weight modules
Removed duplicate words
3 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
Status | File Name | N° Changes | Insertions | Deletions |
Modified | sections/introduction.tex | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Modified | sections/semisimple-algebras.tex | 4 | 2 | 2 |
Modified | sections/sl2-sl3.tex | 2 | 1 | 1 |
diff --git a/sections/introduction.tex b/sections/introduction.tex @@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ over the ring of \(G\)-invariant differential operators -- i.e. \(G\). Proposition~\ref{thm:geometric-realization-of-uni-env} is in fact only the -beginning of a profound connection between the theory of \(D\)-modules and and +beginning of a profound connection between the theory of \(D\)-modules and \emph{representation theory}, the latter of which we now explore in the following section.
diff --git a/sections/semisimple-algebras.tex b/sections/semisimple-algebras.tex @@ -926,8 +926,8 @@ are really interested in is\dots We should point out that proposition~\ref{thm:verma-is-finite-dim} fails for non-dominant \(\lambda \in P\). While \(\lambda\) is always a maximal weight of -\(M(\lambda)\), one can show show that if \(\lambda \in P\) is not dominant -then \(N(\lambda) = 0\) and \(M(\lambda)\) is irreducible. For instance, if +\(M(\lambda)\), one can show that if \(\lambda \in P\) is not dominant then +\(N(\lambda) = 0\) and \(M(\lambda)\) is irreducible. For instance, if \(\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{sl}_2(K)\) and \(\lambda : h \mapsto -2\) then the action of \(\mathfrak{g}\) on \(M(\lambda)\) is given by \begin{center}
diff --git a/sections/sl2-sl3.tex b/sections/sl2-sl3.tex @@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ eigenvalue \(\lambda([E_{1 2}, E_{2 1}]) - 2k\) of the action of \(h\) on \(\bigoplus_{k \in \mathbb{N}} V_{\lambda + k (\alpha_1 - \alpha_2)}\) is \(V_{\lambda + k (\alpha_1 - \alpha_2)}\), the weights of \(V\) appearing the string \(\lambda, \lambda + (\alpha_1 - \alpha_2), \ldots, \lambda + k -(\alpha_1 - \alpha_2), \ldots\) must be symmetric with respect to the the line +(\alpha_1 - \alpha_2), \ldots\) must be symmetric with respect to the line \(B(\alpha_1 - \alpha_2, \alpha) = 0\). The picture is thus \begin{center} \begin{tikzpicture}